Navigation

Risks of not managing and monitoring contracts

last updated: 3rd August 2011

Action
Risk
Solutions
Contract not monitored

- Standards fall and goods/services are not as required under the contract

- Opportunities for possible improvements are not identified or investigated and improved value for money is not achieved
 

- For service contracts ensure a Service Level Agreement (SLA) is developed, agreed and signed by all parties and use this to measure performance of contractor

- For all contracts, seek feedback from end users and take action should problems arise

- Hold regular meetings with the contractor and either ask a number of end user representatives to attend or seek their views beforehand

- Encourage suggestions from all parties on how the contract could be improved (to the benefit of both sides)

Minor problems are not dealt with

- Minor problems develop into major problems

- Standards fall and goods/services are not as required under the contract

- The contractor believes that you are happy to receive the lower quality of service and it may be difficult to raise the standards again

- Staff unhappy with the contract do not use it but purchase the product from a non-contracted supplier

- Seek regular feedback from both the end users and the contractor

- Review complaints and perceived problems, look for patterns and common causes, seek to find solutions

- Seek feedback from the contractor

Relationship becomes too ‘cosy’

- The contractor and end users become complacent and opportunities to gain improved value for money are missed

- The contractor believes that you are happy to receive the lower quality of service and it may be difficult to raise the standards again

- While partnership relationships are encouraged these should be market tested by tendering the requirement on a regular basis (at least every 4 years)

Rating:
0
Your rating: None

Tagging this document or page with a word will add that word to the search terms for finding this page

You can use the above rating system to highlight how useful this content was to you

Comments Comments

Risk
Solutions
Contract not monitored

- Standards fall and goods/services are not as required under the contract

- Opportunities for possible improvements are not identified or investigated and improved value for money is not achieved
 

- For service contracts ensure a Service Level Agreement (SLA) is developed, agreed and signed by all parties and use this to measure performance of contractor

- For all contracts, seek feedback from end users and take action should problems arise

- Hold regular meetings with the contractor and either ask a number of end user representatives to attend or seek their views beforehand

- Encourage suggestions from all parties on how the contract could be improved (to the benefit of both sides)

Minor problems are not dealt with

- Minor problems develop into major problems

- Standards fall and goods/services are not as required under the contract

- The contractor believes that you are happy to receive the lower quality of service and it may be difficult to raise the standards again

- Staff unhappy with the contract do not use it but purchase the product from a non-contracted supplier

- Seek regular feedback from both the end users and the contractor

- Review complaints and perceived problems, look for patterns and common causes, seek to find solutions

- Seek feedback from the contractor

Relationship becomes too ‘cosy’

- The contractor and end users become complacent and opportunities to gain improved value for money are missed

- The contractor believes that you are happy to receive the lower quality of service and it may be difficult to raise the standards again

- While partnership relationships are encouraged these should be market tested by tendering the requirement on a regular basis (at least every 4 years)

0
Your rating: None